Could Dr Pickart list some common ingredients in skin care products that he believes are harmful, so that it is easier for forum members to evaluate other products. Unless this is an extremely long list and not really feasible to put up

That is an excellent idea, David. I would find this useful as well.

Dr. Pickart, thank you for adding this section. I have come to rely on your advice as it has made a HUGE difference in my skin in a rather short period of time. I'm spending less money, and seeing better results.

I'm grateful.

I will keep adding to the list but it takes time. We just sent off Reverse Skin Aging to the printer and I have much more time to visit the Chat group.

That's a good thing. We need you here.

It must be a nice thing to complete that sort of major undertaking. You should celebrate!

Congratulations, Dr. Pickart, on the book in press. I can't wait until it is out.

By the way, when is the book due out?

I, too, would like to congratulate you on finishing your book, Dr. Pickart! I hope that it becomes a best-seller!

Reverse Skin Aging has been sent to the printer. We hope to have it available in about 2 months.

I am so happy that this book will finally be available! YAY!!!!

We are happy to announce the release of the new book Reverse Skin Aging - Using Your Skin's Natural Power by Dr. Loren Pickart.

For more information see:
http://reverseskinaging.com/book.html

For Preview of Table of Contents:
http://reverseskinaging.com/book.html#tableofcontents

Best Wishes,
-Skin Biology

I'm quite sickened that all these cosmeutical industries release products that damage skin. After damaging my skin with Adidas face wash, I depended on these type of products to heal me, but they just worsened me and my health.

Stay Away from Sodium Lauryl and Laureth sulfates.

What cleanser are you using now, Roke?

Roke, you wrote:

quote:

Stay Away from Sodium Lauryl and Laureth sulfates.

Would you please motivate, with supporting scientific references and likewise, offer alternatives.

I work almost daily with the latter and have yet to see a valid reason why they should not be used for their intended purpose if properly selected and formulated.

Regards

Stuart